![canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts](https://img.dokumen.tips/img/1200x630/reader024/reader/2021021820/5500688c4a7959995f8b48ff/r-1.jpg)
- #Canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts install#
- #Canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts update#
- #Canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts software#
Use non stop (i7 2.66), hurra! (seriously) When using the cue manager, it uses all of the processors cores and power 99-100% cpu Procoder UI seems is unstable (might just be me.) until you actually launch conversions, I always have problems when using sorenson*. If anyone wants a test done, I can probably do it towards the end of next week. For these parameters I usually prefer the Mainconcept CODEC in Squeeze 5.n set to multipass VBR for best quality. The vast majoity of my workproduct is SD captured at DV25 & encoded for web delivery as H.264 (either streaming or progressive download).
#Canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts install#
Have sorenson 6 & rhozet 60 day trial on hand waiting for install & testing opportunity. Cleaner 5 & XL, Cleaner Live 2, AMLE, AME, Procoder 2 & 3, Sorenson 3, 4 & 5, Tmpgenc xpress w/ and w/o Leadtek hardware board, QT 7.n Pro, QT Broadcaster, Episode 5.n, Compressor 3 & digital-rapids StreamPro 2.0-2.5.n Stream 3 FE on board waiting for testing opportunity.
#Canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts software#
I have at least tested just about every sub $1000 prosumer/professional encoding software available. On a side note, I recently tried several other encoders, including TMPEGEnc, and found Squeeze 6 to offer a lot more power and features.Īs has been previously written, different tools for different jobs. Squeeze version 6 has become a really powerful encoder with a lot of features, and I would now definitely recommend it over Procoder. The bottom line is that in my opinion, Procoder no longer really competes in this area, and it appears that Canopus has no plans on releasing a new version of it. On that note, version 6 now comes with the VP6 plugin built in, which is a really nice feature. I found that Squeeze 6 has one of the better deinterlacing filters in it's price range, and it allows a LOT of adjustments for both h.264 and On2 VP6 encoding.
![canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts](https://s3.manualzz.com/store/data/025013656_1-2cf159c989576da3d5de1eadab290dc5.png)
There are still some quirks that are annoying, like a gamma shift when using the MainConcept h.264 encoder in Squeeze, but you can adjust for this sort of thing.
![canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts](https://forum.videohelp.com/images/guides/p1735130/procoder.jpg)
Squeeze, on the other hand has really taken some great steps forward, particularly (in my opinion) with version 6. Unfortunately, as others pointed out, ProCoder hasn't been updated in a while - the last update was in 2008 - and it has definitely fallen WAY behind at this point, particularly when it comes to both flash and h.264, which are arguably two of the most important parts of encoding software these days. Squeeze, I always USED to prefer ProCoder 3 to Squeeze.
#Canopus procoder doesnt accespt avs scripts update#
I'm not sure it's logical to compare Carbon Coder to Squeeze since CC is $6000, as opposed to $700 for a new purchase of Squeeze, or a lot less of an upgrade purchase (I believe it's still only $200 to update to Squeeze 6 from version 5, which comes with Avid.) At 30 times the cost (if you already have Squeeze version 5), Carbon Coder had better be a LOT better than Squeeze. To be fair you should really consider Carbon Coder for this comparison, which is the latest version of Procoder, better than Procoder 3.